Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - Information Lifecycle Management
Browsing all 1094 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

what is the residence value set for "Residence time 1 and residence time 2' for the order type that you are currently facing issue with (unable to set deletion indicator).

View Article


Re: Unable to archive DBTABLOG

One has to make experience, I have a copy of the each log, detailed and non-detailed, in a central database for reference. On this way I can know whether I can get some valuable info from it. I would...

View Article


Re: Unable to archive DBTABLOG

touche...!!!

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Hi Manju sir, I set residence time 1 as 39 months and residence time 2 as 0.  Regards,Ningappa

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Hello Manju Sir, Now that issue setting of deletion indicator is got successful. I mean I set residence time 1 as 0 and I tried to archive and I got successful. but I am facing the issue saying " there...

View Article


Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

It is already said in the long text to message KO013 that you have to archive the purchase order before you can archive the CO_ORDERthe same can be seen if you click the network button in SARA (after...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

From the log it is clear that there is dependency exist on the record, means you have to close or archive the purchase order. residence time is nothing to do with this scenario.

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

thanks to all. I m working on what you have given the inputs.

View Article


Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Transaction DB15 can tell you all the tables that are used for archiving object CO_ORDER.The archiving program selection include RKAARCUX checks on aufk-loekz and if jest-stat has VALUE 'I0013'  to...

View Article


Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Hi Jurgen,Yes I checked in AUFK-LOEKZ, deletion flag is set for few orders. when I check in JEST-STAT for deletion indicator, the same orders are not existing or not available in the JEST table. when i...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Go into your customizing and press F1 for the residence time fields, it is well explained.Residence 1 is the time between setting of the deletion flag and the deletion indicatorResidence 2 is the time...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Thanks a ton JurgenI changed Residence time 1 to 0 months and Residence time 2 to 0 months. and I continued the archiving process. now i m able to set the deletion flag deletion indicator successfully...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

and what is the error log of the write job telling you?

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

I am nt getting any error but i am getting one message like no of written data objects are zero.  Thanks,Ningappa

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

make sure you select the small box for order list in the selection screen to get an extended log.

View Article


Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

I m nt getting where i need to select the small box for order list. but i have given some orders in d selection screen.  please find the screen what ever the inputs i have given in the selection screen...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Please have a look into OSS note 1270936 - CO order: Deletion indicator without deletion flagMaybe you created this kind of situation

View Article


Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Hi,I am not getting any proper solution for the above issue. first i have set the deletion flag and then deletion indicator. for the same orders write program is not considering. so please help me on...

View Article

Re: there is still a purchse order commitment for ORD X for CO_ORDER...

Hi Gurus,My Issue got resolved. I have debug the write Program & found the solution. Its authorization Issue. Thanks to all.best regards,Ningappa S M

View Article

how to see ILM options in archiving objects

Hello Experts, I have activated ILM business functions from Sfw5 transaction. After which i am able to see the ILM browers tab in the SARA Transaction.I can see the bulb glowing. However here  is where...

View Article
Browsing all 1094 articles
Browse latest View live