Re: fi_documnt:withholding tax is not displayed
tony, Checked the notes,Those changes are already there in the system . Regards,Krishna .
View ArticleRe: fi_documnt:withholding tax is not displayed
not sure but seems like a program bug, you may rise your concern to SAP via OSS.
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
Is this your first archiving activity ..?My be authorization issue for spool , please check the SU53 dump and try to run thesame variant with different user login.
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
this last answer was probably to quick. I just did another test and entered "FAKE" as material document number in the selection screen. And in turn SAP did not create any spool file and I have the same...
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
Hi,Can you tell me what's the retention period of your article document that you are trying to archive? bye
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
Did you maintain the config table for this archiving object?This allows you to set document life by plant/transaction type.Please review tcode OMB9.
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
@manjunath : No i have performed archiving for other objects and seems no problem with this user id@Siew: The retention period for the Material documents is 2 years (i.e.need to keep last 2 years of...
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
My next step would be to run the archive program with a small sample set of data and set a breakpoint at the SELECT statement from MKPF and evaluate the dynamic WHERE clause that was built. There are...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
HI everyone, I applied this note 1529166 and then executed the archive job for the period 2010 to 2011.Now the job says 22 material documents were found and a spool is generated. But how in that year...
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
Make an analysis either with SE16 or with TAANA and find out how many records you have per period. the period is the financial period, which can be different from calendar year, depending on the setup...
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
Hi Irfan, It can be the scenario wherein only 22 documents amongs ALL are archivable (fullfilling the necessary criteria to get archived).Please analyze in this angle for specific period you have...
View ArticleRe: Issue with archiving MM_MATBEL
please check number of entries in the table MKPF for the archiving period and if you dont find any records then all got archived or if you have some records than see the material doc year for the...
View ArticleDelete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
Hi Experts, how can I deleted from SAP, the archive files stored in Opentext archive Server, after the retention time, is it possible? any suggestions. thanks
View ArticleRe: Delete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
From SAP you cant delete the Archive files stored in the Opentext server, but you can set the retention period for Archive files at Opentext, login to opentext server administrator client and right...
View ArticleRe: Delete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
Thanks Manjunath, yes, I can set the retention time in the repository but the problem is that Archive Server does not purge the documents automatically, please see the answer from OT support: "At...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Delete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
Under the retention tab in content repository you will find an option purge documents , i think it should work.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Re: Material Archiving by SARA
Dear Jurgen, Here is debugging of SE38 after executing MMREO050 :
View ArticleRe: Material Archiving by SARA
Not sure what you want tell me with that screen shot. I can just see that it came successful back from an enhancement.
View ArticleRe: Delete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
Thanks Manjunath, that option does not work.
View ArticleRe: Delete Archive files in Archive Server after retention time
well then you have to go for a manual deletion then..!!!
View Article